News   Classifieds   Community   Directory   Marketplace   My Zwire! 
News Search

Advanced search
 Drizzle 52°
5 Day Forecast

Wednesday 22 May, 2013




 News
 
Top Stories
Local News
State News
Sports
Weather
Farm
Business
Entertainment
Obituaries
Opinion
Daily Leader Live
Daily Leader Photos
 
 Our Newspaper
 
Contact Us
How to Subscribe
How to Advertise
more...
 Classifieds
 
Classifieds Home
Employment
Real Estate
more...
 Community
 
Community Calendar
Community Websites
 Business Directory
 
Advertisers Index
Discount Coupons
All Categories
more...
 Fun and Games
 
Crosswords
Horoscopes
Classic Games
more...

Madison Daily Leaderhome : news : news : farm
Senate panel endorses incentives for wind power
By The Associated Press 02/15/2013
PIERRE (AP) -- A South Dakota Senate committee endorsed a
measure Thursday that would provide financial incentives to
encourage the stalled construction of wind power projects in the state.

The Commerce and Energy Committee voted 6-1 to pass the
measure after lawmakers and industry representatives said
construction of wind farms has drawn to a standstill in
South Dakota because the state imposes much higher taxes
during construction than neighboring states do.

"Let's keep South Dakota open for business in wind energy,"
said Sen. Larry Rhoden, R-Union Center, the main sponsor of
the bill. "Let's give these developers and utilities wanting to build multi-million dollar projects in our state a chance to succeed."

Rhoden and others said South Dakota currently would charge
$7 million to $11 million in sales taxes and contractor's
excise taxes during the construction phase of a typical wind farm. North Dakota, Minnesota and Iowa would charge only $1 million to $2 million, they said.

Rhoden's bill originally sought to give wind projects
refunds of the sales taxes and contractor's excise taxes
they paid during construction, but the committee approved a
new version worked out by the wind energy industry and Gov.
Dennis Daugaard's office.

The new version would give a wind project an incentive
payment roughly equal to 2 percent of its final cost. For
example, a $5 million project would get a $100,000 incentive payment. One costing $100 million would get a $2 million incentive payment.

Dusty Johnson, the governor's chief of staff, said the
incentive projects would be equal to about two-thirds of the sales taxes paid during construction by a wind power project In return for the reduction in construction taxes, new wind farms would no longer get rebates of a gross receipts tax that is applied after they begin operating, Johnson said.

Companies now use rebates of the gross receipts tax during
the first decade of operation to help build transmission
lines.

Johnson said South Dakota now is at a disadvantage to other
states because it has no overall economic incentive program
for large industrial projects. A former tax refund program
has expired, and a new program intended as a replacement was rejected by voters in the November election.

"Under the current tax regime, it's pretty hard to envision
any large scale wind development in the foreseeable future," Johnson said.

Representatives of the wind energy industry said South
Dakota's tax structure puts it at a disadvantage because it
levies a 2 percent excise tax on contractor's gross receipts for a project, a tax other states do not have. South Dakota also charges a 4 percent sales tax on materials used in constructing wind farms and other projects.

Rob Rebenitsch, director of the South Dakota Wind Energy
Association, said South Dakota has 784 megawatts of
installed wind power, while North Dakota has twice as much.
Iowa has 4,536 megawatts of wind power installed, according
to the U.S. Energy Department.

Rebenitsch said more than 13,000 megawatts of wind
generation was installed across the nation last year in 192
projects costing $25 billion.

"Unfortunately, none of that generation was installed in
South Dakota," Rebenitsch said.

Wind energy officials said the bill is a good start, but
they believe larger incentives are needed to attract wind
farms to South Dakota. They said they hope the measure will
be changed to provide larger incentives as it moves through
the Legislature.

Sen. Mark Johnston, R-Sioux Falls, said he objected to the
bill because it deals with only one industry.

Johnson, the governor's chief of staff, said state officials and legislators are making progress in devising an overall incentive program that would cover agricultural processing and all other kinds of large construction projects.


©Madison Daily Leader 2013

Send us your community news, events, letters to the editor and other suggestions. Now, you can submit birth, wedding and engagement announcements online too!


Copyright © 1995 - 2013 madisonet.com All Rights Reserved.